切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (04) : 218 -222. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2017.04.006

论著

乳腔镜下腋窝淋巴结清扫术与常规腋窝淋巴结清扫术术后恢复及并发症的临床比较
刘嘉琦1,(), 何贵金1,()   
  1. 1.110022 沈阳,中国医科大学附属盛京医院第二乳腺外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-11-06 出版日期:2017-08-01
  • 通信作者: 刘嘉琦, 何贵金

Postoperative recovery and complications of axillary lymph node dissection: conventional vs mastoscopic

Jiaqi Liu1,(), Guijin He1,()   

  1. 1.Department of Breast Surgery,Shengjing Hospital Affiliated to China Medical University, Shenyang 110022, China.
  • Received:2016-11-06 Published:2017-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Jiaqi Liu, Guijin He
引用本文:

刘嘉琦, 何贵金. 乳腔镜下腋窝淋巴结清扫术与常规腋窝淋巴结清扫术术后恢复及并发症的临床比较[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(04): 218-222.

Jiaqi Liu, Guijin He. Postoperative recovery and complications of axillary lymph node dissection: conventional vs mastoscopic[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2017, 11(04): 218-222.

目的

分析比较乳腺癌患者乳腔镜下腋窝淋巴结清扫术(MALND)和常规腋窝淋巴结清扫术(CALND)的术后恢复及并发症发生率。

方法

本研究为前瞻性研究。 依据患者纳入和排除标准,将2015 年6 月至2016 年6 月在中国医科大学附属盛京医院第二乳腺外科诊治的60 例乳腔镜下腋窝淋巴结清扫术的乳腺癌患者(MALND 组)作为研究对象,根据患者年龄及乳腺癌TNM 分期1 ∶1 配对选择同期60 例常规腋窝淋巴结清扫术后的乳腺癌患者为对照组(CALND 组),采用配对资料t 检验分析比较2 组患者术后日引流量、拔管时间,采用配对资料χ2 检验分析比较2 组患者术后皮瓣坏死、上肢水肿、感觉异常的发生率。

结果

MALND 组术后腋窝平均日引流量为(17.7±7.2) ml,明显少于CALND 组的(21.4±6.8) ml(t= 2.959,P=0.004);MALND 组术后腋窝平均拔管时间为(7.5±2.3) d,明显小于CALND 组的(8.8±4.1) d(t= 2.057,P=0.044);MALND 组皮瓣坏死发生率为0(0/60),明显低于CALND 组的10.0%(6/60)(P=0.031);MALND 组上肢水肿发生率为3.3%(2/60),明显低于CALND 组的13.3% (8/60)(P=0.031);MALND 组感觉异常发生率为23.3% (14/60),明显低于CALND 组的41.7%(25/60)(P=0.001)。

结论

乳腔镜下腋窝淋巴结清扫术手术损伤小,术后恢复快,明显减少了皮瓣坏死、上肢水肿、感觉异常等并发症的发生率,提高了患者术后生存质量,值得临床推广。

Objective

To analyze the postoperative recovery and complications of breast cancer patients after mastoscopic lymph node dissection (MALND) or conventional axillary lymph node dissection(CALND).

Methods

This was a prospective study. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria,60 breast cancer patients who received MALND in Shengjing Hospital Affiliated to China Medical University from June 2015 to June 2016 served as research group (MALND group). The other 60 breast cancer patients who received CALND served as control group (CALND group) based on the principle of 1 ∶1 paired selection.Paired t test was used to compare the postoperative daily drainage volume and drainage duration between two groups. Paired χ2 test was used to compare the incidence of skin flap necrosis, upper extremity edema and abnormal sensation between two groups.

Results

The postoperative daily drainage volume was (17.7±7.2) ml in MALND group, significantly lower than (21.4±6.8)ml in CALND group(t= 2.959, P=0.004). The drainage duration was (7.5±2.3) d in MALND group, significantly shorter than (8.8±4.1) d in CALND group (t = 2.057, P = 0.044). The incidence of skin flap necrosis was 0(0/60) in MALND group,significantly less than 10.0% (6/60) in CALND group (P=0.031). The incidence of upper extremity edema was 3.3%(2/60) in MALND group, significantly lower than 13.3%(8/60) in CALND group(P=0.031).The incidence of abnormal sensation was 23.3%(14/60) in MALND group, significantly lower than 41.7%(25/60) in CALND group(P=0.001).

Conclusion

Mastoscopic axillary lymph node dissection can reduce postoperative complications such as skin flap necrosis, upper extremity edema and abnormal sensation and improve the patients' quality of life, with small surgical injury and fast postoperative recovery, so it is worthy of clinical application.

图1 乳腺癌患者乳腔镜直视下的淋巴管 注:腔镜下放大的淋巴管
图2 乳腺癌患者乳腔镜直视下的血管 注:腔镜下放大的血管
图3 乳腺癌患者乳腔镜直视下的淋巴结 注:腔镜下放大的淋巴结
表2 MALND 组与CALND 组乳腺癌患者术后腋窝日引流量、腋窝拔管时间比较
图4 乳腔镜下腋窝淋巴结清扫术组患者术后照片
图5 乳腔镜下腋窝淋巴结清扫术组患者术后照片
[1]
张建,陈杰,张新民.乳腔镜乳腺癌保乳术及腋窝淋巴结清扫50 例临床分析[J/CD].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2016,10(6):493-496.
[2]
中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会.中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范(2015 版)[J].中国癌症杂志,2015,25(9):692-754.
[3]
刘永锋,姜军,任国胜,等.乳腺疾病腔镜手术技术操作指南(2016版)[J/CD].中华乳腺病杂志(电子版),2016,10(4):193-199.
[4]
中华医学会外科学分会内分泌外科学组.乳腺疾病腔镜手术技术操作指南(2016 版)[J/CD]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版),2016,10(4):193-199.
[5]
张延勇.乳腔镜辅助下乳腺癌腋窝淋巴清扫与传统开放手术临床效果的比较分析[J]. 齐齐哈尔医学院学报, 2015,36(21):3190-3191.
[6]
王妍,原晓燕,张春侠,等.乳腔镜腋窝淋巴结清扫术与常规淋巴结清扫术治疗乳腺癌的临床效果[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2016,16(20):3887-3889.
[7]
任洪伟.乳腔镜腋窝淋巴结清扫术的临床效果及预后分析[J]. 河北医药,2015,37(16):2466-2468.
[8]
王立兵,冯亮,何静,等. 乳腺癌患者腋窝淋巴结清扫术中保留肋间臂神经的临床意义[J/CD]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版),2015,9(4):236-241.
[9]
石畅,徐卫国.乳腺癌手术中保留肋间臂神经的研究进展[J/CD].中华乳腺病杂志(电子版),2014,8(1):58-60.
[10]
Luo C, Guo W, Yang J, et al. Comparison of mastoscopic and conventional axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer: long-term results from a randomized, multicenter trial[J].Mayo Clin Proc,2012,87(12):1153-1161.
[11]
Nakajo A, Arima H, Hirata M, et al.Bidirectional Approach of Video-Assisted Neck Surgery (BAVANS): Endoscopic complete central node dissection with craniocaudal view for treatment of thyroid cancer[J].Asian J Endosc Surg,2017,10(1):40-46.
[12]
Tukenmez M,Ozden BC,Agcaoglu O,et al. Videoendoscopic sin-gleport nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2014,24(2):77-82.
[13]
Jaroszewski DE, Ewais MM, Pockaj BA. Thoracoscopy for internal mammary node dissection of metastatic breast cancer [ J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2015,25(2):135-138.
[14]
姜军. 乳腺癌腔镜手术的发展[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志,2012,19(9):917-919.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[4] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[5] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[6] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[7] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[8] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[9] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要