切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (01) : 24 -27. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2017.01.005

论著

超声引导下穿刺灌洗治疗哺乳期乳腺脓肿的临床应用价值
雷蕾1, 田春祥1, 宁平1, 陈军1, 刘泽宇1, 梁琦1, 韩晓蓉1,()   
  1. 1.610091 成都市妇女儿童中心医院乳腺外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-08-18 出版日期:2017-02-01
  • 通信作者: 韩晓蓉

Clinical application value of ultrasound-guided needle aspiration for lactational breast abscess

Lei Lei1, Chunxiang Tian1, Ping Ning1, Jun Chen1, Zeyu Liu1, Qi Liang1, Xiaorong Han1,()   

  1. 1.Department of Breast Surgery,Chengdu Women & Children's Central Hospital, Chengdu 610091, China
  • Received:2016-08-18 Published:2017-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiaorong Han
引用本文:

雷蕾, 田春祥, 宁平, 陈军, 刘泽宇, 梁琦, 韩晓蓉. 超声引导下穿刺灌洗治疗哺乳期乳腺脓肿的临床应用价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(01): 24-27.

Lei Lei, Chunxiang Tian, Ping Ning, Jun Chen, Zeyu Liu, Qi Liang, Xiaorong Han. Clinical application value of ultrasound-guided needle aspiration for lactational breast abscess[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2017, 11(01): 24-27.

目的

探讨超声引导下穿刺灌洗术在治疗哺乳期乳腺脓肿中的临床应用价值。

方法

回顾分析2012 年5 月至2015 年10 月成都市妇女儿童中心医院收治的99 例脓腔≥2 个的哺乳期乳腺脓肿患者临床资料,其中超声引导下脓肿穿刺灌洗组51 例,脓肿切开置管引流(切开引流组)48 例。 比较2 组患者的穿刺/换药次数、住院时间、住院费用、回乳率和乳瘘发生率,其中,组间穿刺/换药次数比较采用t 检验,住院时间和住院费用呈偏态分布,且方差不齐,因此用M(P25P75)表示,组间比较采用秩和检验,率的比较采用χ2检验。

结果

穿刺灌洗组患者穿刺/换药次数、住院时间和住院费用均低于切开引流组[(2.1±1.0)次比(4.1±1.0)次,t=-10.003, P<0.001; 7(6 ~8) d 比10(8 ~12) d,Z=-6.026,P<0.001;3 808.0(3 381.7 ~4 328.1)元比5 824.9(4 937.1 ~8 329.0)元,Z=-6.872, P<0.001]。 穿刺灌洗组患者回乳率和乳瘘发生率也均低于切开引流组[58.8% (30/51)比95.8% (46/48),χ2 =18.991, P<0.001;0 比37.5%(18/48),χ2=23.375, P<0.001]。

结论

超声引导下穿刺灌洗术具有操作次数少、住院时间短、住院费用低、回乳率和乳瘘发生率低等优点,在哺乳期乳腺脓肿的治疗中较脓肿切开引流术具有明显的优势,在临床上具有很好的应用价值。

Objective

To investigate the clinical application value of ultrasound-guided needle aspiration for lactational breast abscess.

Methods

A total of 99 patients with lactational breast abscess(≥2 pus cavities) admitted in Chengdu Women and Children's Central Hospital between May 2012 and October 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Fifty-one patients received ultrasound-guided needle aspiration(needle aspiration group), while 48 received incision and drainage (incision and drainage group). The times of aspiration/dressing change, hospital stay and hospitalization expense, rate of milk withdrawal and rate of breast fistula were compared between these two groups. χ2 test was used for comparison on rates, and t test was used for comparison on times of aspiration/dressing change. Because of the skewed distribution and heterogeneous variance, the data on hospital stay and hospitalization expense were expressed as M(P25P75)and compared by rank sum test.

Results

The detected indexes in needle aspiration group were all significantly lower than those in incision and drainage group, including times of aspiration/dressing change (2.1±1.0 vs 4.1±1.0, t=-10.003, P<0.001), hospital stay [ 7(6-8) d vs 10(8-12) d, Z=-6.026, P<0.001],hospitalization expense [3 808.0(3 381.7-4 328.1) yuan vs 5 824.9(4 937.1-8 329.0) yuan, Z=-6.872,P<0.001], rate of milk withdrawal [58.8%(30/51) vs 95.8%(46/48),χ2=18.991, P<0.001] and rate of breast fistula [0 vs 37.5% (18/48), χ2 = 23.375, P <0.001].

Conclusion

Ultrasound-guided needle aspiration has significant advantages over incision and drainage for the treatment of lactational breast abscess,including fewer times of aspiration/dressing change, shorter hospital stay, lower hospitalization expense,decreased rate of milk withdrawal and breast fistula, regarded as an effective method for clinical application.

表1 穿刺灌洗组与切开引流组乳腺脓肿患者的基线资料比较
图1 穿刺灌洗法治疗哺乳期乳腺脓肿效果图 注:a 图为脓肿穿刺灌洗前;b 图为脓肿穿刺灌洗2 次后;c 图为脓肿痊愈后乳房外观
图2 切开置管引流法治疗哺乳期乳腺脓肿效果图 注:a 图为脓肿切开置管引流前;b 图为脓肿切开置管引流后;c 图为脓肿痊愈后乳房外观
表2 穿刺灌洗组与切开引流组乳腺脓肿患者疗效及卫生经济学指标比较
[1]
Department of Nutrition for Health and Development, World Health Organization. Report of the expert consultation of the optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding, Geneva, Switzerland, 28-30 March 2001[EB/OL]. [2016-07-10]. http:/ /apps. who. int/iris/handle/10665/67219.
[2]
高雅军, 马祥君, 何湘萍,等. 哺乳期急性乳腺炎发展成乳腺脓肿的相关因素分析[J/CD]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2015(1):35-38.
[3]
黎介寿,吴孟超,黄志强. 普通外科手术学[M]. 2 版. 北京:人民军医出版社,2005.
[4]
赵志全, 黄汉源. 乳腺导管瘘的诊断和治疗[J]. 中华普通外科杂志,1998,13(4):252-253.
[5]
杨振明. 小切口闭式负压持续引流在乳腺脓肿治疗中的应用[J].临床合理用药杂志,2014,7(18):88-89.
[6]
刘海波. 小切口负压引流治疗乳腺脓肿34 例治疗体会[J]. 中外医学研究,2013,11(32):57-58.
[7]
续哲莉, 边学海, 王瑞庆,等. Mammotome 微创旋切系统治疗乳腺脓肿:附53 例报告[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2007, 16(11):1063-1065.
[8]
Wang K, Ye Y, Sun G. The Mammotome biopsy system is an effective treatment strategy for breast abscess[J]. Am J Surg, 2013, 205(1):35-38.
[9]
廖丹,王宇坤, 傅汉锟,等. 麦默通微创旋切术治疗乳腺脓肿12 例[J]. 中国临床新医学,2013,6(1):62-63.
[10]
Karstrup S, Nolsøe C, Brabrand K, et al. Ultrasonically guided percutaneous drainage of breast abscesses [J]. Acta Radiologica,1990,31(2):157-159.
[11]
Karstrup S, Solvig J, Nolsøe CP, et al. Acute puerperal breast abscesses: US-guided drainage [J]. Radiology, 1993, 188 (3):807-809.
[12]
顾兵, 朱荣峰, 郭建锋,等. 超声引导下穿刺冲洗治疗乳腺脓肿的临床价值[J]. 中国介入影像与治疗学,2011,8(3):186-188.
[13]
汪旭云, 郭天康. 超声引导下穿刺冲洗与切开引流治疗乳腺脓肿的Meta 分析[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2016,23(4):472-477.
[1] 陆婷, 范晴敏, 王洁, 万晓静, 许春芳, 董凤林. 超声引导下经皮穿刺置管引流对重症急性胰腺炎的疗效及应用时机的选择[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 511-516.
[2] 魏丽坤, 张旭红, 罗营, 薛凤霞, 王颖梅, 宋学茹, 田丽娜, 张艳芳, 王艳霞, 田文艳. 卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿发生恶变并发盆腔脓肿1例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(06): 696-702.
[3] 朱然, 于清霞, 林鹏, 叶莉萍. 产气荚膜梭菌感染致血管内溶血并肝脓肿一例[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 187-190.
[4] 鲁鑫, 杨琴, 许佳怡. 不同术式治疗恶性梗阻性黄疸疗效及对免疫功能的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 180-183.
[5] 鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[6] 林英, 何洪, 杨琦, 姚兴伟, 马婧涵, 杨玉婷, 刘月红, 贾悦, 李长安. 联合宏基因组二代测序诊断普雷沃氏菌致肺脓肿1例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 625-629.
[7] 滕达, 许悦, 张萌. 腹腔镜下经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术治疗胆总管结石的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 537-542.
[8] 崔佳琪, 吴迪, 陈海艳, 周惠敏, 顾元龙, 周光文, 杨军. TACE术后并发肝脓肿的临床诊治分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 688-693.
[9] 王春霞, 赵丽霞, 张迪, 张洪来, 张维胜, 王涛, 杨熊飞. 肛周坏死性筋膜炎伴腹膜后延伸一例病例报道[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 256-259.
[10] 陈景星, 吴建雄, 谭焯荣, 杜宁超. 肛周脓肿感染臀深筋膜致臀大肌深部脓肿一例报道[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 158-161.
[11] 毛宁, 徐文婷, 朱勇. 孟德尔随机化探索雄性激素水平与肛周脓肿的关系[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 490-494.
[12] 李新宇, 梁建锋. 3D打印导板辅助颅内血肿穿刺引流手术[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 382-384.
[13] 周军, 赵志明, 刘运锋, 唐兆伟, 宋常华, 刘杰, 李浩然, 吴绍光. 神经内镜下脑室血肿清除术与脑室外引流术治疗脑室内出血的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 86-92.
[14] 张昊悦, 汤正好. 腰大肌脓肿的诊断与治疗研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 299-302.
[15] 李琴, 莫伟, 周碧芳, 李玉莲, 阳秀春. 经皮肝穿刺胆道引流术后患者指南健康问题清单的构建[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 386-391.
阅读次数
全文


摘要