切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华乳腺病杂志(电子版) ›› 2010, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (06) : 676 -682. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2010.06.010

临床研究

应用ROC曲线分析评价肿瘤标志物糖类抗原15-3、癌胚抗原在乳腺癌诊断与术后监测中的价值
范海燕1,(), 孟凡云1, 章阳2, 魏仲香1, 关众2   
  1. 1.252000 聊城,聊城职业技术学院
    2.252000 聊城市人民医院乳腺甲状腺外科
  • 收稿日期:2009-12-02 出版日期:2010-12-01
  • 通信作者: 范海燕
  • 基金资助:
    聊城职业技术学院2009年科研项目(2009LZY36)

Evaluation of the clinical value of CA15-3 and CEA in diagnosis and postoperative monitoring of breast cancer using ROC curves

Hai-yan FAN,1(), Fan-yun MENG1, Yang ZHANG1, Zhong-xiang WEI1, Zhong GUAN1   

  1. 1.Medical Department,Liaocheng Polytechnic College,Liaocheng 252000,China
  • Received:2009-12-02 Published:2010-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Hai-yan FAN
引用本文:

范海燕, 孟凡云, 章阳, 魏仲香, 关众. 应用ROC曲线分析评价肿瘤标志物糖类抗原15-3、癌胚抗原在乳腺癌诊断与术后监测中的价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2010, 04(06): 676-682.

Hai-yan FAN, Fan-yun MENG, Yang ZHANG, Zhong-xiang WEI, Zhong GUAN. Evaluation of the clinical value of CA15-3 and CEA in diagnosis and postoperative monitoring of breast cancer using ROC curves[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2010, 04(06): 676-682.

目的

评价肿瘤标志物糖类抗原15-3(carbohydrate antigen,CA15-3)、癌胚抗原(carcino-embryonic antigen,CEA)在乳腺癌诊断与术后复发转移判断中的应用价值。

方法

采用化学发光免疫分析法测定110例乳腺癌患者、50例乳腺良性疾病患者及40例正常对照者的血清CA15-3、CEA 水平。组间比较采用χ2 检验。用ROC曲线评价CA15-3、CEA 在乳腺癌诊断和术后复发转移判断中的应用价值。

结果

110例患者中CA15-3 和CEA 阳性检出率分别为32.7% (36/110)和12.7% (14/110)。I期、II期乳腺癌患者CA15-3、CEA 血清含量无明显变化,与良性组和正常对照组相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.050)。以43例Ⅲ期、Ⅳ期乳腺癌患者的CA15-3、CEA测定值绘制ROC 曲线,分析显示,CA15-3、CEA 的ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)分别为82.3%、81.1%,95%可信区间分别为0.719~0.929、0.714~0.906。术后复发转移患者CA15-3、CEA 阳性检出率分别为85.7% (18/21)、52.4%(11/21),AUC 分别为97.8%、89.1%,95%可信区间分别为0.944~1.011、0.790~0.991。

结论

通过ROC曲线评价可得出,CA15-3、CEA 对Ⅲ期、Ⅳ期乳腺癌诊断有临床参考价值,在术后复发转移诊断中有较高的应用价值,可作为乳腺癌术后监测复发转移的有效指标。

Objective

To explore and evaluate the clinical value of tumor markers,carbohydrate antigen(CA)15-3 and carcino-embryonic antigen(CEA)in diagnosis of breast cancer and postoperative monitoring of recurrence and metastasis.

Methods

The serum CA15-3 and CEA levels were measured by chemiluminescent immunoassay(CILA)technique in 110 breast cancer patients,50 benign breast tumor patients and 40 healthy controls.Chi-square test was used for comparison between groups.ROC curve was used to evaluate the application value of CA153 and CEA as tumor markers in diagnosis and judgment of postoperative recurrence and metastasis for breast cancer.

Results

In the 110 breast cancer patients,the positive rates of CA15-3 and CEA were 32.7% (36/110)and 12.7% (14/110),respectively.There was no obvious change in the serum levels of CA15-3 and CEA in stage I and II breast cancer paients,with no statistical difference compared with the benign group and the control group(P>0.050).ROC curve analysis was done only in the 43 patients of stage III and IV breast cancer,which showed the area under the ROC curve(AUC)of CA15-3 and CEA was 82.3%and 81.1%,and the 95%CI was 0.719~0.929 and 0.714~0.906,respectively.For postoperative recurrence and metastasis,the positive rates of CA15-3 and CEA were 85.7% (18/21)and 52.4% (11/21),the AUC was 97.8%and 89.1%,the 95%CI was 0.944~1.011 and 0.790~0.991,respectively.

Conclusions

CA15-3 and CEA as tumor markers both have reference value in diagnosis of stage III and IV breast cancer patients and applicable value in diagnosis of postoperative recurrence and metastasis.

表1 不同组CA15-3、CEA 测定阳性率比较
图1 CA15-3、CEA 乳腺癌诊断ROC曲线
表2 CA15-3、CEA 诊断乳腺癌ROC曲线下面积
表3 CA15-3、CEA 血清水平对乳腺癌诊断的评价性能指标
表4 术后无复发组与复发转移组CA15-3、CEA 测定阳性率比较
图2 CA15-3、CEA 乳腺癌复发转移ROC曲线
表5 CA15-3、CEA 诊断乳腺癌复发转移ROC曲线下面积
表6 CA15-3、CEA 血清水平对乳腺癌复发转移的评价性能指标
[1]
谢飞,吕军,冯景,等.CA153,CEA 和CYFRA21-1联合检测对乳腺癌诊断的临床意义.郧阳医学院学报,2009,28:45-47.
[2]
于志强,韦伟,罗明华.乳腺癌患者CA15-3、C-erbB-2联合检测的临床意义及二者关系.华中医学杂志,2008,32:91-92.
[3]
陈智周,范振符,杨剑,等.肿瘤标志物CA15-3的免疫放射分析及其临床应用.中华肿瘤杂志,1998,20:125-127.
[4]
Shiozaki H,Doki Y,Yamana H,et al.A multi-institutional study of immunohistochemical investigation for the roles of cyclin D1 and E-cadherin in superficial squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.J Surg Oncol,2002,79:166-173.
[5]
刘光,皋岚湘,丁华野,等.乳腺癌中癌胚抗原(CEA)与p53,nm23-HI蛋白表达和部分病理指标的相关性研究.中国组织化学与细胞化学杂志,2000,9:71-73.
[6]
宇传华.诊断试验评价//余松林.医学统计学.北京:人民卫生出版社,2002:172.
[7]
牛爱军,张志强,孙晓明,等.乳腺癌患者CEA、CA15-3临床应用价值探讨.实用医学杂志,2004,21:210-213.
[8]
AL-Jarallah MA,Behbehani AE,EI-Nass SA,et al.Serum CA15-3 and CEA patterns in postsurgical follow-up,and in monitoring clinical course of metastatic cancer in patients with breast carcinoma.Eur J Surg Oncol,1993,9:74-79.
[9]
Tomey DC,Waalk TP,Synder JJ,et al.Biological markers in breast carcinomaⅢ:clinical correlation with carcinoembryonic antigen.Cancer,1977,39:2397-2404.
[10]
Molina R,Jo J,Filella X,et al.C-erbB-2 CEA and CA15-3 serum levels in the early diagnosis of recurrence in breast cancer patients.Anti Cancer Res,1999,19:2551-2555.
[1] 王亚红, 蔡胜, 葛志通, 杨筱, 李建初. 颅骨骨膜窦的超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(11): 1089-1091.
[2] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[3] 周荷妹, 金杰, 叶建东, 夏之一, 王进进, 丁宁. 罕见成人肋骨郎格汉斯细胞组织细胞增生症被误诊为乳腺癌术后骨转移一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 380-383.
[4] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[5] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[6] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[7] 熊鹰, 林敬莱, 白奇, 郭剑明, 王烁. 肾癌自动化病理诊断:AI离临床还有多远?[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 535-540.
[8] 赵月, 田坤, 张宗明, 郭震天, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓. 降钙素原对老年急性重度胆囊炎发生的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 801-806.
[9] 严虹霞, 王晓娟, 张毅勋. 2 型糖尿病对结直肠癌患者肿瘤标记物、临床病理及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 483-487.
[10] 陈倩倩, 袁晨, 刘基, 尹婷婷. 多层螺旋CT 参数、癌胚抗原、错配修复基因及病理指标对结直肠癌预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 507-511.
[11] 李浩, 陈棋帅, 费发珠, 张宁伟, 李元东, 王硕晨, 任宾. 慢性肝病肝纤维化无创诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 863-867.
[12] 谭瑞义. 小细胞骨肉瘤诊断及治疗研究现状与进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 781-784.
[13] 王子阳, 王宏宾, 刘晓旌. 血清标志物对甲胎蛋白阴性肝细胞癌诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 677-681.
[14] 陈慧, 邹祖鹏, 周田田, 张艺丹, 张海萍. 皮肤镜对头皮红斑性皮肤病辅助鉴别诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 692-698.
[15] 胡云鹤, 周玉焯, 付瑞瑛, 于凡, 李爱东. CHS-DRG付费制度下GB1分组住院费用影响因素分析与管理策略探讨[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 568-574.
阅读次数
全文


摘要